"Hari Puttar" is set to hit cinema screens this week after an Indian court rejected a Warner Bros. lawsuit claiming the name was too close to its Harry Potter series.
1 Comment Add this link to... Bury
1 Comment Add this link to... Bury
Groxx -- a play on \It Rocks!\ and \I Grok\ -- is a link sharing and voting site on the theme of \weird\ news.
This is probably one of the saddest...and sickest...things I've heard. I...
iam cedrick jr's mother .. i want you to know cedrick jr will be a man and...
Well, I think it would have been polite to ask, or, if he was afraid that...
Any word on the role of the Jack Russell terrier in this caper?? anyone?...
There is a concept in copyright law called fair use. McCain's legal...
Arrested him? Sounds like another ZT case of overreaction....
I read the comments to this story and some of them really frightened me....
Well, at least there were no nude pictures of the user's wife in it....
Comments
"Warner Bros. spokeswoman Deborah Lincoln said the company was reviewing the judgment.
"We brought these proceedings because we believe that the proposed title and marketing of the defendants' film infringed our intellectual property rights," Lincoln said in an e-mail
That statement is a little confusing to me...wouldn't the intellectual property rights belong to J.K. Rowling??