"Fraudulent possession of women's underwear" was the result of having been badly affected by his parents' divorce during his formative years. Personal Responsibility, anyone?
Discuss Add this link to... Bury
Discuss Add this link to... Bury
Groxx -- a play on \It Rocks!\ and \I Grok\ -- is a link sharing and voting site on the theme of \weird\ news.
It's not so much that they didn't realize it. It's more likely that...
He bit her toes...for ten years???? And he thinks THAT is what finally...
Actually, the way you subscribe to Groxx is by using RSS. Just click on...
I guess they will have a less merry Christmas....
To Leazerkk: You asked the same question three times in a row.
Is there any way I can subscribe to your site? Thanks! Cheers kamagra jon....
Cute idea, but I don't think the idea of advertising within a learning...
Perhaps, like the judge who sentenced teens to listen to Manilow, this...
Comments
If he would have had his clothes on, no one would have noticed. Stupid man!
OTOH, if it would have been a woman wearing a bikini, no one would have minded. Sexual discrimination? ;o)
"Fraudulent possession of women's underwear?" Obviously Singapore's laws differ from ours... that's certainly a specific one!